Filling the pool again Filling the pool again\images\insights\article\pool-fill-with-water-small.jpg June 12 2024 June 3 2024

Filling the pool again

With the Fed on hold and tax collection over, assets resume flowing into liquidity products. 

Published June 3 2024
My Content

Summer doesn’t officially start until June 21, but Memorial Day marks the opening of public pools. That means municipalities were filling them in May with the clear, shimmering water that beckons children from coast to coast.

Liquidity vehicles experienced their own flows in May (you probably knew I was headed in this direction…). Many lost assets in March and April, but it was largely due to corporate and individual tax dates, not from the beginning of the end of cash’s reign. After two years of its kingly status, some would like to see other asset classes be more attractive. But money market funds, retail in particular, are only growing in favor as they ride the Federal Reserve’s reticence to cut rates. Both total industry money funds and total industry retail funds had inflows in May. Modest, but inflows.

Could it be that the pool will overflow? Some media reports have issued concern that, due to elevated yields, earnings from money funds have risen to around 1% of U.S. GDP, suggesting the economy might not be as strong as it seems. Others have pointed to record amount of assets in money funds as a risk if clients reallocate to other investments when the Fed eases.

The former claim is absurd. Money funds are simply another source of earnings, and consumers continue to spend. The latter argument falls apart when seen in relative terms. Since 2013, money fund assets worldwide have averaged 15-17% of total mutual fund assets and ETFs. At the end of 2023, that figure was 17.3%. For comparison, it was approximately 45% during the height of the Global Financial Crisis. The reasoning that the financial system is threatened by the success of liquidity products is specious. While it is always important to look for stress in the markets, this seems more a case of investor angst. Or maybe jealousy. In any case, we think there’s room for liquidity vehicles to grow, and the expected influx of institutional assets have not begun in earnest yet.

Keeping with the swimming pool metaphor, the U.S. Treasury Department is acting like a drain. On May 29, it began a program to buy back a set amount of government securities. My colleague Susan Hill lays this out well in an earlier piece. The gist is that Secretary Janet Yellen and company want to support the Treasury market by increasing liquidity via purchases on the secondary market. The focus now is on bonds and notes, but Treasury plans on targeting bills to lessen market volatility when it issues fewer short-term securities because it has a surfeit of cash. While it won’t make a ton of difference if the buyback amount is modest, as it has been so far, it can only help cash managers.

Moving target

It would be easier to name the Fed governors and branch presidents who didn’t speak in May than those who did. One gets the feeling that dissent will be coming, especially as the minutes of the May Federal Open Market Committee meeting were more hawkish than the neutral-to-dovish spin Chair Jerome Powell gave in his press conference.

We already know that the three quarter-point cuts the Federal Reserve once penciled for the second half of this year have been postponed. We expect to get only one or two now. However, the specter of a rate hike raised its frightful head in the May meeting: “Various participants mentioned a willingness to tighten policy further should risks to inflation materialize in a way that such an action became appropriate.” Despite this warning, we do not anticipate a hike. One thing to note is that the idea that the Fed will avoid cutting rates in September so as not to appear to interfere with the general election, forgoing rate action when warranted by the data might also look politically motivated. The argument cuts both ways, so to speak.

Liquidity at large

The Swedes joined the Swiss in May when its Riksbank cut interest rates, becoming the second major central bank to do so. It decreased its benchmark rate by a quarter point to 3.75%, the same amount by which the Swiss National Bank lowered its to 1.50% in March. The next domino to fall is likely the European Central Bank, which many think will ease at its meeting on June 6. Based on the progress the EU has seen in lowering inflation, the markets have priced in a 25 basis-point cut, which would take its benchmark to 3.75%.

The outlook for the Bank of England and Bank of Canada is less certain. The former kept rates at 5.25% in May. Declining U.K. inflation suggests it will ease at its June 20 meeting, but the markets don’t anticipate it. For the latter, traders have fully priced in a rate cut in July, with the June 5 meeting in play. The Reserve Bank of Australia appears to be wary of an elongated pause in the decline of the country’s inflation and will likely keep rates at 3.35%. The Bank of Japan is likely to take it slow with hikes in case inflation pulls back, though a board member said waiting too long is also a risk.

Tags Liquidity . Monetary Policy . Markets/Economy . Interest Rates .

Views are as of the date above and are subject to change based on market conditions and other factors. These views should not be construed as a recommendation for any specific security or sector.

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a broad measure of the economy that measures the retail value of goods and services produced in a country.

An investment in money market funds is neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although some money market funds seek to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in these funds.

Issued and approved by Federated Investment Management Company